Occurrence record: Entomology:HET2629
PreservedSpecimen
of
Entometa guttularis
| Boxtree Moth
Dataset
| Data partner | OZCAM (Online Zoological Collections of Australian Museums) Provider |
| Data resource | Museums Victoria provider for OZCAM |
| Institution code |
Museums Victoria
Supplied institution code "NMV" |
| Collection code | Museums Victoria Entomology Collection |
| Catalog number | HET2629 |
| Occurrence ID | urn:lsid:ozcam.taxonomy.org.au:NMV:Entomology:PreservedSpecimen:HET2629 |
| Basis of record | Preserved specimen |
| Preparations | pinned |
| Sex | Female |
| Individual count | 1 |
| Associated Occurrence Status | Associated record |
| Associated occurrences |
The occurrence is associated with a representative record.
For more information see Inferred associated occurrence details |
| License | CC0 Supplied as https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode |
| Collection ID | urn:lsid:biocol.org:col:34978 |
| Owner institution code | NMV |
| Rightsholder | Museums Victoria |
| Language | en |
| Occurrence status | present |
| Dataset ID | Entomology |
| Institution ID | urn:lsid:biocol.org:col:34978 |
| Collection code | Entomology |
| Abcd identification qualifier | Not provided |
Event
| Date precision | Not Supplied |
Taxonomy
| Higher classification | Animalia | Arthropoda | Hexapoda | Insecta | Lepidoptera | Bombycoidea | Lasiocampidae | Lasiocampinae |
| Scientific name |
Entometa guttularis
Supplied scientific name "Entometa guttularis (Walker, 1855)" |
| Taxon rank | species |
| Common name | Boxtree Moth |
| Kingdom | Animalia |
| Phylum | Arthropoda |
| Class | Insecta |
| Order | Lepidoptera |
| Family | Lasiocampidae |
| Genus | Entometa |
| Species | Entometa guttularis |
| Taxonomic issue | No issues |
| Name match metric |
Exact match
The supplied name matched the name exactly. |
| Name parse type | SCIENTIFIC |
| Scientific name authorship | (Walker, 1855) |
| Nomenclatural code | ICZN |
Geospatial
| Higher geography | Australia | Queensland |
| Country | Australia |
| State / Province | Queensland |
| Locality | Brisbane |
| Latitude | -27.47 |
| Longitude | 153.02 |
| Geodetic datum |
EPSG:4326 Supplied datum: "WGS84" |
| Verbatim locality | Brisbane |
| Coordinate precision | Unknown |
| Biome | Terrestrial |
Additional properties
Data quality tests
| Test name | Result |
| Invalid collection date | Failed |
| Incomplete collection date | Warning |
| Basis of record not supplied | Passed |
| Basis of record badly formed | Passed |
| Missing catalogue number | Passed |
| Data are generalised | Passed |
| Collection code not recognised | Passed |
| Institution code not recognised | Passed |
| Missing taxonomic rank | Passed |
| Name not supplied | Passed |
| Kingdom not recognised | Passed |
| Name not recognised | Passed |
| Resource taxonomic scope mismatch | Passed |
| Invalid scientific name | Passed |
| Name not in national checklists | Passed |
| Decimal coordinates not supplied | Passed |
| Geodetic datum assumed WGS84 | Passed |
| Unrecognized geodetic datum | Passed |
| Coordinates are transposed | Passed |
| Coordinates are out of range for species | Passed |
| Supplied coordinates are zero | Passed |
| Zero latitude | Passed |
| Zero longitude | Passed |
| Supplied country not recognised | Passed |
| Location not supplied | Passed |
| Country inferred from coordinates | Passed |
| Supplied coordinates centre of state | Passed |
| Coordinates centre of country | Passed |
| Missing geodetic datum | Passed |
| Coordinates dont match supplied state | Passed |
| Habitat incorrect for species | Passed |
| Show/Hide 12 missing properties | |
| Show/Hide 43 tests that have not been run | |
Outlier information
This record has been detected as an outlier using the Reverse Jackknife algorithm for the following layers:
-
Radiation - seasonality (Bio23) - CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences
Notes: Data derived using ANUCLIM v6 (beta) with the new set of climate surfaces (centred on 1990), by Dr. Kristen Williams.
Scale: 0.01 degree (~1km)
More information on the data quality work being undertaken by the Atlas is available here:
Inferred associated occurrence details
This record is associated with the representative record. This mean another record has been detected to be similar to this record, and that the other record (the representative record) has the most detailed information for the occurrence. More information about the duplication detection methods and terminology in use is available here:
| Representative Record | |||
| Record UUID | d038e9e5-2195-4068-a23c-2faa86eae419 | ||
| Data Resource | Museums Victoria provider for OZCAM | ||
| Raw Scientific Name | Entometa guttularis (Walker, 1855) | ||
| Coordinates | -27.47,153.02 | ||
| Collector | [Dr Thomas P. Lucas] | ||
| Related records | |||
| Record UUID | 71e7aa0a-1c26-47d5-934d-16eb57418a1a | ||
| Data Resource | Museums Victoria provider for OZCAM | ||
| Raw Scientific Name | Entometa guttularis (Walker, 1855) | ||
| Coordinates | -27.47,153.02 | ||
| Collector | [Dr Thomas P. Lucas] | ||
| Comments |
Collectors were identical
Occurrence was compared without date Coordinates were identical |
||
| Record UUID | 79b24208-2e13-4cba-a1d9-d40e79567fd2 | ||
| Data Resource | Museums Victoria provider for OZCAM | ||
| Raw Scientific Name | Entometa guttularis (Walker, 1855) | ||
| Coordinates | -27.47,153.02 | ||
| Comments |
One of the collectors was null or unknown
Occurrence was compared without date Coordinates were identical |
||
| Record UUID | 79cfe228-4cef-4912-9827-f27ce80c7df3 | ||
| Data Resource | Museums Victoria provider for OZCAM | ||
| Raw Scientific Name | Entometa guttularis (Walker, 1855) | ||
| Coordinates | -27.47,153.02 | ||
| Comments |
One of the collectors was null or unknown
Occurrence was compared without date Coordinates were identical |
||
| Record UUID | d4db752c-8ced-446d-8613-687d2fec837b | ||
| Data Resource | Museums Victoria provider for OZCAM | ||
| Raw Scientific Name | Entometa guttularis (Walker, 1855) | ||
| Coordinates | -27.47,153.02 | ||
| Comments |
One of the collectors was null or unknown
Occurrence was compared without date Coordinates were identical |
||
