Occurrence record: Marine Molluscs of Tasmania - 8893
of
Cardita aviculina
recorded on 2005-03-29
Dataset
Data resource | Marine Molluscs of Tasmania |
Catalogue Number | 8893 |
Basis of record | Not supplied |
Collector/Observer |
Grove, S. Simon
Supplied as "Simon Grove" |
Rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Australia License. |
Associated Occurrence Status | Representative record |
Inferred Associated Occurrences |
This record has 1 inferred associated occurrences
For more information see Inferred associated occurrence details |
License | CC-BY-NC |
Occurrence remarks | N.B. Nearly all records from this provider are from beached material ('death assemblages'), and do not necessarily indicate the presence of live animals at the recorded locality. |
Occurrence status | present |
Abcd identification qualifier | Not provided |
Event
Record date |
2005-03-29
Supplied date "29/03/2005" |
Date precision | Day |
Taxonomy
Scientific name |
Cardita aviculina
Supplied scientific name "Cardita excavata" |
Taxon rank | species |
Kingdom | Animalia |
Phylum | Mollusca |
Class | Bivalvia |
Order |
Carditida
Supplied as "Veneroida" |
Family | Carditidae |
Genus | Cardita |
Species | Cardita aviculina |
Taxonomic issues | No issues |
Name match metric |
Exact match
The supplied name matched the name exactly. |
Name parse type | SCIENTIFIC |
Superfamily | Carditoidea |
Geospatial
Country | Australia |
State or Territory | Tasmania |
Locality | Pirates Bay, Eaglehawk Neck |
Latitude | -43.0265 |
Longitude | 147.9283 |
Geodetic datum | EPSG:4326 |
Coordinate precision | Unknown |
Coordinate uncertainty in metres | 1000.0 |
Biome | Marine |
Additional properties
basis of reocrd | Perserved Specimen |
bibliobraphic citation | Record derived from Simon Grove's database of Tasmanian molluscs; see also http://www.molluscsoftasmania.net |
specimen count | 1 |
subclass | Heterodonta |
Data quality tests
Test name | Result |
Occurrence status assumed to be present | Warning |
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84 | Warning |
Country inferred from coordinates | Warning |
Invalid collection date | Passed |
Incomplete collection date | Passed |
First of the month | Passed |
Collector name unparseable | Passed |
Missing catalogue number | Passed |
Data are generalised | Passed |
Name not supplied | Passed |
Name not recognised | Passed |
Invalid scientific name | Passed |
Name not in national checklists | Passed |
Decimal coordinates not supplied | Passed |
Coordinates are transposed | Passed |
Coordinates are out of range for species | Passed |
Supplied coordinates are zero | Passed |
Zero latitude | Passed |
Zero longitude | Passed |
Coordinate uncertainty not valid | Passed |
Coordinate uncertainty not specified | Passed |
Location not supplied | Passed |
Supplied coordinates centre of state | Passed |
Coordinates centre of country | Passed |
Missing geodetic datum | Passed |
Habitat incorrect for species | Passed |
Show/Hide 12 missing properties | |
Show/Hide 48 tests that have not been run |
Inferred associated occurrence details
This record has been identified as the representative occurrence in a group of associated occurrences. This mean other records have been detected that seem to relate to this record and this particular record has the most detailed information on the occurrence. More information about the duplication detection methods and terminology in use is available here: