Occurrence record: invertebrates:E41262
PreservedSpecimen
of
Brachidontes erosus
| Beaked Mussel
recorded on 2012-02-11
Dataset
Data provider | OZCAM (Online Zoological Collections of Australian Museums) Provider |
Data resource | Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery provider for OZCAM |
Institution |
Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery
Supplied institution code "TMAG" |
Collection |
Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Invertebrate Collection
Supplied collection code "invertebrates" |
Catalogue Number | E41262 |
Occurrence ID | TMAG: E41262 |
Basis of record | Preserved specimen |
Identified by | S.J. Grove |
Identified date | 2017 |
Collector |
Grove, S.J.
Supplied as "S.J. Grove" |
Individual count | 1 |
Associated Occurrence Status | Representative record |
Inferred Associated Occurrences |
This record has 1 inferred associated occurrences
For more information see Inferred associated occurrence details |
License | CC-BY |
Sampling protocol | By hand |
Dataset name | Grove Collection |
Occurrence remarks | shore-based record |
Occurrence status | present |
Abcd identification qualifier | Not provided |
Date identified | 2017 |
Event
Collecting date |
2012-02-11
Supplied as year:2012 month:2 day:11 |
Sampling protocol | By hand |
Date precision | Day |
Taxonomy
Scientific name | Brachidontes erosus |
Original name | Brachidontes erosus |
Taxon rank | species |
Common name | Beaked Mussel |
Kingdom | Animalia |
Phylum | Mollusca |
Class | Bivalvia |
Order |
Mytilida
Supplied as "Mytiloida" |
Family | Mytilidae |
Genus | Brachidontes |
Species | Brachidontes erosus |
Taxonomic issues | No issues |
Name match metric |
Exact match
The supplied name matched the name exactly. |
Name parse type | SCIENTIFIC |
Geospatial
Country | Australia |
State or Territory | Tasmania |
Locality | Rocky Cape: Castle Rock Bay |
Latitude | -40.8873 |
Longitude | 145.5226 |
Geodetic datum |
EPSG:4326 Supplied datum: "GDA94" |
Coordinate precision | 0.0001 |
Biome | Marine |
Additional properties
order name | Mytiloida |
Data quality tests
Test name | Result |
Coordinate uncertainty not valid | Failed |
Coordinates converted to WGS84 | Warning |
Basis of record not supplied | Passed |
Basis of record badly formed | Passed |
Invalid collection date | Passed |
Incomplete collection date | Passed |
Identification date before occurrence date | Passed |
First of the month | Passed |
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation | Passed |
Missing identification date | Passed |
Collector name unparseable | Passed |
Missing catalogue number | Passed |
Data are generalised | Passed |
Collection code not recognised | Passed |
Institution code not recognised | Passed |
Missing taxonomic rank | Passed |
Name not supplied | Passed |
Kingdom not recognised | Passed |
Name not recognised | Passed |
Invalid scientific name | Passed |
Name not in national checklists | Passed |
Decimal coordinates not supplied | Passed |
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84 | Passed |
Unrecognized geodetic datum | Passed |
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed | Passed |
Coordinates are transposed | Passed |
Coordinates are out of range for species | Passed |
Supplied coordinates are zero | Passed |
Zero latitude | Passed |
Zero longitude | Passed |
Supplied country not recognised | Passed |
Missing coordinate precision | Passed |
Precision / range mismatch | Passed |
Coordinate precision not valid | Passed |
Location not supplied | Passed |
Country inferred from coordinates | Passed |
Supplied coordinates centre of state | Passed |
Coordinates centre of country | Passed |
Missing geodetic datum | Passed |
Coordinates dont match supplied state | Passed |
Habitat incorrect for species | Passed |
Show/Hide 8 missing properties | |
Show/Hide 37 tests that have not been run |
Inferred associated occurrence details
This record has been identified as the representative occurrence in a group of associated occurrences. This mean other records have been detected that seem to relate to this record and this particular record has the most detailed information on the occurrence. More information about the duplication detection methods and terminology in use is available here: